Pedagogy is the study of the theory and practice of education. It is concerned with the underlying values and principles that influence our approaches to learning, teaching and assessment.
What makes for great pedagogy?
The National College for Teaching and Leadership’s paper, What makes great pedagogy? Nine claims from research (2012), outlines nine characteristics of highly successful pedagogies based on their review of the literature. They conclude that effective pedagogies:
- give serious consideration to pupil voice.
- depend on behaviour (what teachers do), knowledge and understanding (what teachers know) and beliefs (why teachers act as they do).
- involve clear thinking about longer term learning outcomes as well as short-term goals.
- build on pupils’ prior learning and experience.
- involve scaffolding pupil learning.
- involve a range of techniques, including whole-class and structured group work, guided learning and individual activity.
- focus on developing higher order thinking and meta-cognition, and make good use of dialogue and questioning in order to do so
- embed assessment for learning.
- are inclusive and take the diverse needs of a range of learners, as well as matters of student equity, into account.
Before we think about how to teach, we need to consider how people learn.
This section refers to general theories of learning and teaching. Our Models and Frameworks page builds upon these to provide an overview of specific frameworks, models and curricula for developing Information Literacy.
No single learning theory can address the requirements of every teaching and learning event. A combination of perspectives is the most likely and effective approach. Below are three prominent learning theory frameworks and their corresponding teaching approaches.
|Learning theory framework||Corresponding teaching approaches|
|Behaviorism is a theory of animal and human learning that only focuses on objectively observable behaviors and discounts mental activities. A desired task is first analyzed for its learning objectives. Procedures to teach each sub-task and tests for mastery at each stage of learning are then designed. Students work at their own pace but receive reinforcement for behaviours that move them towards achievement of the task. Behaviour is shaped towards the final goal using by modeling the desired outcome, using programed instruction sequences in small steps with immediate reinforcement, and behaviour modification where only correct behaviours are selectively reinforced (Grassian and Kaplowitz, 2001).
Theorists: Ivan Pavlov, B. F. Skinner, Edward Thorndike and John Watson.
Grassian, E. S. and Kaplowitz, J. R. 2001. Information literacy instruction: Theory and practice. New York: Neal-Schuman.
|LEARNING THEORY FRAMEWORK||CORRESPONDING TEACHING APPROACHES|
|Cognitive theorists view learning as involving the acquisition or reorganization of the cognitive structures through which humans process and store information (Good and Brophy, 1990).
Theorists: Albert Bandura, Jean Piaget, Jerome Bruner, David Ausubel.
Metacognitive learning theory addresses strategies students need to help themselves monitor and direct their own learning. These strategies include predicting outcomes, planning research steps, time management, decision-making, and alternate strategies when a search fails (Donovan et al., 1999).
Donovan, M. S. et al. Eds. 1999. How people learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Good, T. L. and Brophy, J. E. 1990. Educational psychology: A realistic approach. 4th ed. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Kobelski, P. and Reichel, M. 1981. Conceptual frameworks for bibliographic instruction. Journal of Academic Librarianship 7(2), pp. 73 -77.
Slavin, R. E. 2006. Educational psychology: Theory and practice. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson
|LEARNING THEORY FRAMEWORK||Corresponding Teaching APPROACHES|
| A philosophy of learning founded on the premise that, by reflecting on our experiences, we construct our own understanding of the world we live in. Each of us generates our own “rules” and “mental models,” which we use to make sense of our experiences. Learning, therefore, is the process of adjusting our mental models to accommodate new experience (Schunk, 2008).
Theorists: Jean Piaget, Lev Vygosky, Howard Gardner, Carl Bereiter, Marlene Scardamalia.
Cooperstein, S. E. and Kocevar-Weidinger, E. 2004. Beyond active learning: a constructivist approach to learning. Reference Services Review. 32(2), pp. 141-148.
Schunk, D. H. 2008. Learning theories: An educational perspective. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
This content is reproduced under a CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 licence from the Information Literacy within a Quality Assurance Framework: An Ideas Exchange for Librarian wiki, licensed by Corrine Laverty.
|Theories of learning||James Atherton’s Learning and Teaching site provides a more in-depth discussion of each of the Behaviourist, Cognitivist and Constructivist views.|
|Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle||Taken from David A. Kolb’s (1984) book, Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development, this theory emphasises the role that experience plays in the learning process. Effective learning occurs by moving through a four-stage cycle of:
|Bloom’s Learning Taxonomy||This is a well-known classification developed by Dr Benajmin Bloom in 1956 (and updated by Anderson and Krathwohl in 2001) to recognise the varying levels and forms of learning and to encourage the development of higher-order thinking in education. It distinguishes between cognitive, affective and psychomotor forms of learning. It identifies six levels of learning within these: Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analysing, Evaluating and Creating.
The Ideas Exchange for Librarians wiki provides Information Literacy-specific examples for each of Bloom’s differing levels of learning.
|JISC Review of e-learning theories, frameworks and models||This report by Mayes and de Freitas (2004) examines commonly used pedagogical frameworks for elearning, for example, Laurillard’s Conversational Framework, Gilly Salmon’s Five Stage Model, or Mayes’ and Fowler’s Framework.
It maps learning theory onto technology-enhanced pedagogical approaches to help you make decisions about where, when and how it might be appropriate to use technology in your teaching.
|Teaching implications of learning theories||This page from the University of Illinois’ Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning translates some of the underlying principles from learning theory into practicable take-aways for improving your teaching.|
Whilst the underlying theories of learning remain largely consistent, pedagogic approaches are constantly evolving. The Open University’s annual Innovating Pedagogy reports summarise contemporary forms of teaching, learning and assessment made popular by interactive and digital teaching environments.
Below are links to some of the most widely used approaches to learning and teaching at present. This list is not exhaustive and is intended as a starting point to encourage you to think about varying your teaching approach according to need, audience and topic.
|Active Learning||Active learning is any approach whereby students engage in activities, such as reading, writing, discussion, or problem solving that promote analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of content. Cooperative learning, problem-based learning, enquiry-based learning and the use of case methods and simulations are some approaches that promote active learning.|
|Problem-based learning||Problem Based Learning (PBL) is one approach to promoting active learning. Manchester Metropolitan’s Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) describe the process:
Students learn in small groups and are supported by a facilitator, using a structured approach and a specific PBL model. A topic is introduced through scenarios, triggers or problems which leads to in-depth collaborative inquiry. Group members are assigned specific roles. These rotate to help students develop different aspects of working in groups beyond their development of understanding linked to a specific scenario and topic.
Read more on Problem-Based Learning from MMU CETL or review IL practitioners’ experiences:
The Flipped Learning Network define Flipped Learning as:
“…a pedagogical approach in which direct instruction moves from the group learning space to the individual learning space, and the resulting group space is transformed into a dynamic, interactive learning environment where the educator guides students as they apply concepts and engage creatively in the subject matter”.
Theory or directions can be removed from the classroom and imparted in advance, for example, via short video or online tutorials. This frees up more face-to-face time for one-to-one or small group interactions with students. Students can review the flipped content as many times as is necessary to grasp the subject matter and come to class ready to grapple with practical exercises, answer questions, work on collaborative projects, and explore the content further.
The Flipped Learning Network acts as a hub for educators interested in this approach, connecting them to research, practice and resources on the topic.
Read more about flipping the information literacy classroom:
|Team-based learning||Team-Based Learning (TBL) is a particular approach to flipped learning. It is an evidence-based collaborative learning teaching strategy designed around a three-step cycle which spans one class or unit of instruction: preparation activities, an in-class readiness assurance test, and an application-focused exercise.|